(;FF[4]AP[Torus2.0.1]US[jandew]SZ[9]GN[2020-11-18 emmajoe v erin canted dominoes dire for black]DT[2020-11-18]RE[B+]PB[jandew]PW[erin];B[ee];W[ii];B[hf];W[ac];B[gd];W[hb];B[fg];W[ba];B[dh](;W[db])(;W[cd];B[cf];W[db];B[ae];W[ag]C[Consider the sequence BI7, WI8, BG8, WC8];B[if](;W[ch]C[Utter garbage, BB8 is death]GB[2])(;W[bd];B[ig];W[ah];B[bh];W[bi];B[ci];W[bg];B[ha];W[hi];B[ia](;W[ai];B[fb]C[God help us if F9 instead is relevant];W[cg]C[Is there a better move for black after this?](;B[ab]GW[2](;W[ch];B[bg];W[ca];B[di];W[eh];B[da](;W[cb]C[White not entirely sure that balck can't just do BB3];B[ch];W[dg];B[fi];W[ch](;B[dg]C[oops])(;B[di];W[eh];B[dg];W[di];B[ch]))(;W[bb]GB[2];B[di]GB[2]))(;W[bb]C["remarkably constrained for black"]GW[2];B[cc]GW[2];W[aa];B[ii];W[ih];B[ag];W[ia]))(;B[gc]C[Is WI1 forced, or is WC8 valid? Are there any alternatives to the following line?

How about WC1?]CM[];W[ch];B[bg];W[ca](;B[ea])(;B[di];W[eh];B[da]C[White might have different responses here];W[ch];B[di];W[eh];B[fi];W[ch];B[di];W[eh];B[dg];W[ch];B[aa];W[ch];B[bi];W[bh];B[ch])))(;W[ab]GB[2];B[ic]GB[2]))))
